Cadillac BLS
Car comparison
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6vsNissan Teana 3.5 i V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Teana
3.5 i V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful255 hp190 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,585 kg3,494 lb
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score78/100
Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6
- Lowest city consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range648 km403 mi
- Largest trunk476 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | NissanTeana3.5 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 255hp190kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,589kg3,503lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 66.7s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.1s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 537km334mi Calculated | 648km403mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,792cc170cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,680mm184in | 4,845mm191in |
| Width | 1,752mm69in | 1,765mm69in |
| Height | 1,471mm58in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,675mm105in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,530mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,535mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 476L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 259g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
- Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | NissanTeana3.5 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.1 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 has 10 hp more than Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 7.5 s |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 and Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 537 km 334 mi |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 648 km 403 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 7.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.9 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 255 hp 190 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 537 km 334 mi | 648 km 403 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 259 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 476 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 | Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 4 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6
- Has 111 km (69 mi) more estimated range
- Has 51 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























