Jaguar X-type (X400)
Car comparison
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24VvsNissan Teana 3.5 i V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Teana
3.5 i V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range648 km403 mi
- Largest trunk476 L
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | NissanTeana3.5 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 279Nm206lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,589kg3,503lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.2s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 66.7s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.4s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 581km361mi Calculated | 648km403mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,968cc181cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,845mm191in |
| Width | 1,789mm70in | 1,765mm69in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,710mm107in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,530mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,537mm61in | 1,535mm60in |
| Trunk volume | - | 476L |
| Max trunk volume | 452L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 6,800 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | NissanTeana3.5 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.4 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 231 hp 172 kW |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 has 14 hp more than Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V and Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 7.5 s |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 7.9 s |
Although Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 has more power, Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V and Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 581 km 361 mi |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 648 km 403 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.5 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.9 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 581 km 361 mi | 648 km 403 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 452 L 16.0 cu ft | 476 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V | Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V
- Is 19 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 51 Nm more
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 67 km (42 mi) more estimated range
- Has 24 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























