Volvo S80 · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Volvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.5T 20VvsJaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar X-type (X400)
3.0 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk452 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Lowest city consumption14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 279Nm206lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,530kg3,373lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 65.2s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.8s Calculated | 28.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 581km361mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,968cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,822mm190in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,789mm70in |
| Height | 1,434mm56in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,562mm61in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,537mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,106L | 452L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: Power / Torque
- Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 6,800 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.8 s | 28.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 231 hp 172 kW |
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V has 21 hp more than Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V and Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 7.7 s |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.5 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 581 km 361 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 452 L 16.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Has 41 Nm more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V
- Has 21 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 12 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























