Cadillac BLS
Car comparison
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6vsHyundai Sonata V (NF) 3.3i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHyundai Sonata V (NF)
3.3i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful255 hp190 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score56/100
Hyundai Sonata V (NF) 3.3i V6 24V
- Lightest1,571 kg3,463 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range693 km431 mi
- Largest trunk523 L
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | HyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 255hp190kW | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 304Nm224lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,571kg3,463lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,130kg4,696lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 74.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.1s Calculated | 27.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 194Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 537km334mi Calculated | 693km431mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,792cc170cu in | 3,342cc204cu in |
| Length | 4,680mm184in | 4,800mm189in |
| Width | 1,752mm69in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,471mm58in | 1,474mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,675mm105in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,550mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 523L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 259g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
- Hyundai Sonata V (NF) 3.3i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| HyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | HyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.1 s | 27.5 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
| HyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V | 235 hp 175 kW |
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 has 20 hp more than Hyundai Sonata V (NF) 3.3i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Hyundai Sonata V (NF) 3.3i V6 24V and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| HyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V | 304 Nm 224 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| HyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V | 1,571 kg 3,463 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| HyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 7.5 s |
| HyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 and Hyundai Sonata V (NF) 3.3i V6 24V: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| HyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Hyundai Sonata V (NF) 3.3i V6 24V and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| HyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 537 km 334 mi |
| HyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V | 693 km 431 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 7.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| HyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| HyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| HyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| HyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacBLS2.8 T V6 | HyundaiSonata V (NF)3.3i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 255 hp 190 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 304 Nm 224 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 1,571 kg 3,463 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 537 km 334 mi | 693 km 431 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 259 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 523 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 | Hyundai Sonata V (NF) 3.3i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 61 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Hyundai Sonata V (NF) 3.3i V6 24V
- Is 14 kg lighter
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 156 km (97 mi) more estimated range
- Has 98 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























