Car comparison

Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6vsLexus RC F 5.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac ATS Coupe

V 3.6 V6

471 hp3564 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2016-2019
VS

Lexus RC

F 5.0

477 hp4969 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2014-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    298 km/h
    185 mph
  • Highest torque
    603 Nm
    445 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,725 kg
    3,803 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    273 hp/t
    204 kW/t
    3.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.8 L/100 km
    17.0 mpg US
    20.5 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    84/100

Lexus RC F 5.0

  • Most powerful
    477 hp
    356 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.8 L/100 km
    21.8 mpg US
    26.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    611 km
    380 mi
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6LexusRCF 5.0
Power
471hp351kW
477hp356kW
Torque
603Nm445lb-ft
530Nm391lb-ft
Curb weight
1,725kg3,803lb
1,860kg4,101lb
Gross weight-
2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
63.8s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph
Calculated
65.0s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
4.5s
0-200 km/h
12.9s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
4.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.1s
Calculated
12.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb
Calculated
256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton
Calculated
285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
488km303mi
Calculated
611km380mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,564cc217cu in
4,969cc303cu in
Length
4,691mm185in
4,705mm185in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,845mm73in
Height
1,384mm54in
1,390mm55in
Wheelbase
2,775mm109in
2,730mm107in
Front track
1,538mm61in
1,555mm61in
Rear track
1,559mm61in
1,560mm61in
Trunk volume
295L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
61L
66L
CO2 emissions-
251g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6Lexus RC F 5.0PowerTorque
  • Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
  • Lexus RC F 5.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V65,850 rpm3,500 rpm6,500 rpm
LexusRCF 5.06,400-7,100 rpm4,800-5,600 rpm7,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6LexusRCF 5.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
4.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
4.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.9 s
14.4 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.2 s
10.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.1 s
12.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
194 km/h
120 mph
187 km/h
116 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW
LexusRCF 5.0
477 hp
356 kW

Lexus RC F 5.0 has 6 hp more than Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 and Lexus RC F 5.0: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
603 Nm
445 lb-ft
LexusRCF 5.0
530 Nm
391 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
LexusRCF 5.0
1,860 kg
4,101 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
298 km/h
185 mph
LexusRCF 5.0
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V64.2 s
LexusRCF 5.04.5 s

Although Lexus RC F 5.0 has more power, Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 and Lexus RC F 5.0: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
LexusRCF 5.0
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus RC F 5.0 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
LexusRCF 5.0
256 hp/t
191 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
488 km
303 mi
LexusRCF 5.0
611 km
380 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW
4.2 s
298 km/h
185 mph
LexusRCF 5.0
477 hp
356 kW
4.5 s
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,691 mm
184.7 in
Height
1,384 mm
54.5 in
LexusRCF 5.0
Power
477 hp
356 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,705 mm
185.2 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
LexusRCF 5.0
Power
477 hp
356 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK

Lexus RC F 5.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
4.2 s
LexusRCF 5.0
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
4.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
LexusRCF 5.0
256 hp/t
191 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6LexusRCF 5.0
Power
471 hp
351 kW
477 hp
356 kW
Torque
603 Nm
445 lb-ft
530 Nm
391 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
4.5 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Lightness
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
1,860 kg
4,101 lb
Fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,691 mm
184.7 in
Height
1,384 mm
54.5 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,705 mm
185.2 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in
Range score
488 km
303 mi
611 km
380 mi
CO2 score
-
251 g/km
Trunk score
295 L
10.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
256 hp/t
191 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6Lexus RC F 5.0
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km18.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi30.42 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year2,835 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6

  • Has 73 Nm more
  • Is 135 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Lexus RC F 5.0

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 123 km (77 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
Lexus RC F 5.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

V 3.6 V6
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
F 5.0
300
VS
LexusRCF 5.0vsLexusRCFacelift 2018300
V 3.6 V6
Grand sport 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsChevroletCorvette Coupe (C7)Grand sport 6.2 V8
F 5.0
500 V8
VS
LexusRCF 5.0vsLexusLC500 V8
V 3.6 V6
6.2 V8
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
F 5.0
AMG C 63 V8
VS
LexusRCF 5.0vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 V8
V 3.6 V6
MC 4.7 V8
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsMaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8
F 5.0
S 500
VS
LexusRCF 5.0vsMercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)S 500
V 3.6 V6
CS 3.0
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsBMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
F 5.0
MC Stradale 4.7 V8
VS
LexusRCF 5.0vsMaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8
V 3.6 V6
Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
VS
CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6vsPorsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
F 5.0
4.0 V8
VS
LexusRCF 5.0vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 vs Lexus RC F 5.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster