Car comparison

Volvo S90 2.0 D5vsBuick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019 28T 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S90

2.0 D5

235 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2018-2020
VS

Buick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019

28T 2.0

240 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S90 2.0 D5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    480 Nm
    354 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS902.0 D5BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Power
235hp175kW
240hp179kW
Torque
480Nm354lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,953kg4,306lb
1,600kg3,527lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
71.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
66.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
23.6s
Calculated
26.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,091km678mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,963mm195in
5,026mm198in
Width
1,879mm74in
1,866mm73in
Height
1,443mm57in
1,462mm58in
Wheelbase
2,941mm116in
2,905mm114in
Front track
1,628mm64in
1,599mm63in
Rear track
1,629mm64in
1,602mm63in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
-
Trunk volume
500L
-
Max trunk volume-
523L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
-
CO2 emissions
144g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S90 2.0 D5Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0PowerTorque
  • Volvo S90 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
  • Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS902.0 D54,000 rpm-5,000 rpm
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.05,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS902.0 D5BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.6 s
26.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
240 hp
179 kW

Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0 has 5 hp more than Volvo S90 2.0 D5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 D5 and Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D5
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D5
1,953 kg
4,306 lb
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
1,600 kg
3,527 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D5
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D57.0 s
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.07.5 s

Although Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0 has more power, Volvo S90 2.0 D5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 D5 and Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D5
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 D5 and Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS902.0 D5
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS902.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW
7.0 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.5 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS902.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,963 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
523 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
5,026 mm
197.9 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS902.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Volvo S90 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS902.0 D5
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
7.0 s
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS902.0 D5
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS902.0 D5BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0
Power
235 hp
175 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,953 kg
4,306 lb
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
Fuel consumption
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,963 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
523 L
18.5 cu ft
Length
5,026 mm
197.9 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
Range score
1,091 km
678 mi
-
CO2 score
144 g/km
-
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
523 L
18.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S90 2.0 D5Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0
Consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.63 LC100 km12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.49 LC100 mi19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used825 L218 US gal181 UK gal1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,444 LC/year1,811 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S90 2.0 D5

  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 353 kg lighter
  • Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 23 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S90 2.0 D5
Buick LaCrosse III China 28T 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoS902.0 D5vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
28T 2.0
2.0i
VS
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 D5
45 TDI V6
VS
VolvoS902.0 D5vsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TDI V6
28T 2.0
25d
VS
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)25d
28T 2.0
28T
VS
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0vsCadillacCT6 II28T
2.0 D5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS902.0 D5vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
28T 2.0
2.0i
VS
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 D5
1.8 TCe
VS
VolvoS902.0 D5vsRenaultTalisman1.8 TCe
2.0 D5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoS902.0 D5vsVolvoS60 II2.0 T5
28T 2.0
Redline 550T
VS
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0vsChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T
28T 2.0
730i
VS
BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0vsBMW7 Series (G11 LCI)Facelift 2019730i
2.0 D5
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoS902.0 D5vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
Volvo S90 2.0 D5 vs Buick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019 28T 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster