Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300vsBuick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019 28T 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBuick LaCrosse III China · Facelift 2019
28T 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight156 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score63/100
Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk523 L
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | 2,335kg5,148lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.3s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 685km426mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 5,026mm198in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,866mm73in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,462mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,905mm114in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,599mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,602mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 523L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300: Power / Torque
- Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 5,800 rpm | 2,000-3,200 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.3 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 258 hp 192 kW |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 has 18 hp more than Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 6.0 s |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 and Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | BuickLaCrosse III ChinaFacelift 201928T 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 685 km 426 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 523 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 | Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Buick LaCrosse III China Facelift 2019 28T 2.0
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 68 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























