Car comparison

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsBuick Envision II Plus 652T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-80

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Buick Envision II

Plus 652T

237 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph Unrestricted
    219 km/h
    136 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,276 km
    793 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Buick Envision II Plus 652T

  • Lightest
    1,890 kg
    4,167 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    515 L
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DBuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
Power
254hp189kW
237hp177kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
2,136kg4,709lb
1,890kg4,167lb
Gross weight
2,781kg6,131lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
99.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
92.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
40.9s
Calculated
42.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.7mpg US36.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
125hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,276km793mi
Calculated
889km552mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,995mm197in
4,845mm191in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,883mm74in
Height
1,710mm67in
1,695mm67in
Wheelbase
3,120mm123in
2,833mm112in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,610mm63in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,612mm63in
Ground clearance
170mm7in
-
Trunk volume
258L
515L
Max trunk volume
1,971L
1,712L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
7
Fuel tank
74L
68L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DBuick Envision II Plus 652TPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
  • Buick Envision II Plus 652T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D3,750 rpm1,500-2,400 rpm4,000 rpm
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T5,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DBuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.9 s
42.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
237 hp
177 kW

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 17 hp more than Buick Envision II Plus 652T.

The biggest power difference is between Buick Envision II Plus 652T and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 17 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
1,890 kg
4,167 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T8.4 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
7.7 L/100 km
30.7 mpg US
36.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Buick Envision II Plus 652T: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
125 hp/t
94 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,276 km
793 mi
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
889 km
552 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
237 hp
177 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
515 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,845 mm
190.7 in
Height
1,695 mm
66.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.7 mpg US
36.9 mpg UK

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.4 s
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
7.7 L/100 km
30.7 mpg US
36.9 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
125 hp/t
94 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.7 mpg US
36.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DBuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
Power
254 hp
189 kW
237 hp
177 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
1,890 kg
4,167 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.7 mpg US
36.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
515 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,845 mm
190.7 in
Height
1,695 mm
66.7 in
Range score
1,276 km
793 mi
889 km
552 mi
Trunk score
258 L
9.1 cu ft
515 L
18.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
125 hp/t
94 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DBuick Envision II Plus 652T
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.7 mpg US36.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km13.39 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi21.55 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal1,148 L303 US gal252 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year2,008 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 17 hp more
  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 387 km (240 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Buick Envision II Plus 652T

  • Is 246 kg lighter
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 257 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Buick Envision II Plus 652T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Plus 652T
28T
VS
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652TvsCadillacGT428T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
Plus 652T
40 TFSI
VS
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652TvsAUDIQ640 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Plus 652T
650T
VS
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652TvsChevroletBlazer650T
Plus 652T
45 TFSI
VS
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Plus 652T
45 TDI V6
VS
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652TvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
450TSI
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs Buick Envision II Plus 652T - car comparison - FastVsFaster