Car comparison

Buick Envision II Plus 652TvsCadillac GT4 25T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Buick Envision II

Plus 652T

237 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-2024
VS

Cadillac GT4

25T

211 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Buick Envision II Plus 652T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    237 hp
    177 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    131 hp/t
    98 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    919 km
    571 mi
  • Largest trunk
    515 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Cadillac GT4 25T

  • Lightest
    1,660 kg
    3,660 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBuickEnvision IIPlus 652TCadillacGT425T
Power
237hp177kW
211hp157kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
270Nm199lb-ft
Curb weight
1,805kg3,979lb
1,660kg3,660lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
87.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
80.7s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.1s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
40.7s
Calculated
63.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.9s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton
Calculated
163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
919km571mi
Calculated
882km548mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,845mm191in
4,633mm182in
Width
1,883mm74in
1,878mm74in
Height
1,695mm67in
1,536mm60in
Wheelbase
2,833mm112in
2,800mm110in
Front track
1,610mm63in
1,616mm64in
Rear track
1,612mm63in
1,619mm64in
Ground clearance-
131mm5in
Trunk volume
515L
289L
Max trunk volume
1,712L
1,190L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
68L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Buick Envision II Plus 652TCadillac GT4 25TPowerTorque
  • Buick Envision II Plus 652T: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac GT4 25T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T5,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm
CadillacGT425T5,500 rpm1,750-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBuickEnvision IIPlus 652TCadillacGT425T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.1 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.7 s
63.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.9 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
237 hp
177 kW
CadillacGT425T
211 hp
157 kW

Buick Envision II Plus 652T has 26 hp more than Cadillac GT4 25T.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac GT4 25T and Buick Envision II Plus 652T: 26 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
CadillacGT425T
270 Nm
199 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
1,805 kg
3,979 lb
CadillacGT425T
1,660 kg
3,660 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
CadillacGT425T
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T8.1 s
CadillacGT425T8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Buick Envision II Plus 652T and Cadillac GT4 25T: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
CadillacGT425T
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac GT4 25T and Buick Envision II Plus 652T: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
CadillacGT425T
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
919 km
571 mi
CadillacGT425T
882 km
548 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
237 hp
177 kW
8.1 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
CadillacGT425T
211 hp
157 kW
8.8 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
515 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,845 mm
190.7 in
Height
1,695 mm
66.7 in
CadillacGT425T
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
289 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,633 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,536 mm
60.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
CadillacGT425T
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Buick Envision II Plus 652T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
8.1 s
CadillacGT425T
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
CadillacGT425T
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBuickEnvision IIPlus 652TCadillacGT425T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
211 hp
157 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.1 s
8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,805 kg
3,979 lb
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
515 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,845 mm
190.7 in
Height
1,695 mm
66.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
289 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,633 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,536 mm
60.5 in
Range score
919 km
571 mi
882 km
548 mi
Trunk score
515 L
18.2 cu ft
289 L
10.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBuick Envision II Plus 652TCadillac GT4 25T
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km11.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi19.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year1,785 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Buick Envision II Plus 652T

  • Has 26 hp more
  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 37 km (23 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 226 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Cadillac GT4 25T

  • Is 145 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Buick Envision II Plus 652T
Cadillac GT4 25T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Buick Envision II Plus 652T vs Cadillac GT4 25T - car comparison - FastVsFaster