AUDI Q3 II (F3)
Car comparison
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSIvsBuick Envision II Plus 652T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBuick Envision II
Plus 652T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,776 kg3,915 lb
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Buick Envision II Plus 652T
- Most powerful237 hp177 kW
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range919 km571 mi
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 228hp170kW | 237hp177kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,776kg3,915lb | 1,805kg3,979lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 83.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 87.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.2s Calculated | 40.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 561km348mi Calculated | 919km571mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,485mm177in | 4,845mm191in |
| Width | 1,849mm73in | 1,883mm74in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,695mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,833mm112in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,610mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,612mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 515L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,525L | 1,712L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Buick Envision II Plus 652T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 5,000-6,700 rpm | 1,700-4,400 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.2 s | 40.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 228 hp 170 kW |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 237 hp 177 kW |
Buick Envision II Plus 652T has 9 hp more than AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI and Buick Envision II Plus 652T: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 1,776 kg 3,915 lb |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 7.4 s |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 8.1 s |
Although Buick Envision II Plus 652T has more power, AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI and Buick Envision II Plus 652T: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Buick Envision II Plus 652T and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI: 3.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 561 km 348 mi |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 919 km 571 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 228 hp 170 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 237 hp 177 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Buick Envision II Plus 652T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 228 hp 170 kW | 237 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,776 kg 3,915 lb | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 561 km 348 mi | 919 km 571 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 515 L 18.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI | Buick Envision II Plus 652T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.72 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,809 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI
- Is 29 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Buick Envision II Plus 652T
- Has 9 hp more
- Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 358 km (223 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























