Buick Envision II
Car comparison
Buick Envision II Plus 652TvsAUDI Q6 40 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q6
40 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Buick Envision II Plus 652T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful237 hp177 kW
- Lightest1,805 kg3,979 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range919 km571 mi
- Largest trunk515 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score85/100
AUDI Q6 40 TFSI
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | AUDIQ640 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 237hp177kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,805kg3,979lb | 2,205kg4,861lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,765kg6,096lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 87.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 104.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.7s Calculated | 52.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.4mpg US30.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 168Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 919km571mi Calculated | 757km470mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,845mm191in | 5,099mm201in |
| Width | 1,883mm74in | 2,014mm79in |
| Height | 1,695mm67in | 1,784mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,833mm112in | 2,980mm117in |
| Front track | 1,610mm63in | 1,704mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,612mm63in | 1,721mm68in |
| Trunk volume | 515L | 286L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,712L | 2,398L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | AUDIQ640 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.7 s | 52.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 237 hp 177 kW |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 231 hp 172 kW |
Buick Envision II Plus 652T has 6 hp more than AUDI Q6 40 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q6 40 TFSI and Buick Envision II Plus 652T: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 8.1 s |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Buick Envision II Plus 652T and AUDI Q6 40 TFSI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Buick Envision II Plus 652T and AUDI Q6 40 TFSI: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 919 km 571 mi |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 757 km 470 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 237 hp 177 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 231 hp 172 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ640 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ640 TFSI |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Buick Envision II Plus 652T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | AUDIQ640 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 237 hp 177 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 919 km 571 mi | 757 km 470 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 515 L 18.2 cu ft | 286 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Buick Envision II Plus 652T | AUDI Q6 40 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.4 mpg US30.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 16.19 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 26.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,388 L367 US gal305 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 2,428 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Buick Envision II Plus 652T
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 400 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 162 km (101 mi) more estimated range
- Has 229 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
AUDI Q6 40 TFSI
- Has 20 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























