Car comparison

AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSIvsCadillac GT4 25T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 III (GU)

2.0 TFSI

204 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Cadillac GT4

25T

211 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph Unrestricted
    226 km/h
    140 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    340 Nm
    251 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    890 km
    553 mi
  • Largest trunk
    520 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Cadillac GT4 25T

  • Most powerful
    211 hp
    157 kW
  • Lightest
    1,660 kg
    3,660 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    127 hp/t
    95 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSICadillacGT425T
Power
204hp152kW
211hp157kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
270Nm199lb-ft
Curb weight
1,835kg4,045lb
1,660kg3,660lb
Gross weight
2,460kg5,423lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
226 km/h140 mph
Calculated
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
107.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
80.8s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
37.5s
Calculated
63.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
890km553mi
Calculated
882km548mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,717mm186in
4,633mm182in
Width
1,900mm75in
1,878mm74in
Height
1,662mm65in
1,536mm60in
Wheelbase
2,820mm111in
2,800mm110in
Front track
1,645mm65in
1,616mm64in
Rear track
1,637mm64in
1,619mm64in
Ground clearance-
131mm5in
Trunk volume
520L
289L
Max trunk volume
1,473L
1,190L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSICadillac GT4 25TPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac GT4 25T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI4,300-6,000 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
CadillacGT425T5,500 rpm1,750-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSICadillacGT425T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.5 s
63.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
226 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
144 km/h
89 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
204 hp
152 kW
CadillacGT425T
211 hp
157 kW

Cadillac GT4 25T has 7 hp more than AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI and Cadillac GT4 25T: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
CadillacGT425T
270 Nm
199 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
1,835 kg
4,045 lb
CadillacGT425T
1,660 kg
3,660 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
226 km/h140 mph
CadillacGT425T
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI8.6 s
CadillacGT425T8.8 s

Although Cadillac GT4 25T has more power, AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI and Cadillac GT4 25T: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
CadillacGT425T
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac GT4 25T and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
CadillacGT425T
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
890 km
553 mi
CadillacGT425T
882 km
548 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
204 hp
152 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
226 km/h140 mph
CadillacGT425T
211 hp
157 kW
8.8 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
226 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,717 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
CadillacGT425T
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
289 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,633 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,536 mm
60.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
226 km/h140 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
CadillacGT425T
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
8.6 s
CadillacGT425T
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
CadillacGT425T
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSICadillacGT425T
Power
204 hp
152 kW
211 hp
157 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
226 km/h140 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,835 kg
4,045 lb
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,717 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
289 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,633 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,536 mm
60.5 in
Range score
890 km
553 mi
882 km
548 mi
Trunk score
520 L
18.4 cu ft
289 L
10.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSICadillac GT4 25T
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.78 LC100 km11.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.56 LC100 mi19.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,916 LC/year1,785 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI

  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 8 km (5 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 231 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Cadillac GT4 25T

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Is 175 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
Cadillac GT4 25T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TFSI
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI
25T
1.6T
VS
CadillacGT425TvsHyundaiKona II1.6T
2.0 TFSI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
25T
2.0d
VS
CadillacGT425TvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI
25T
380TSI
VS
CadillacGT425TvsVolkswagenTavendor380TSI
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
25T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
CadillacGT425TvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TFSI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
25T
Standard Range 50 kWh
VS
CadillacGT425TvsTeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh
2.0 TFSI
45 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
25T
2.2 CRDi
VS
CadillacGT425TvsHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI vs Cadillac GT4 25T - car comparison - FastVsFaster