Cadillac GT4
Car comparison
Cadillac GT4 25TvsHyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) · Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) · Facelift 2020
2.2 CRDi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,196 km743 mi
- Largest trunk831 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score45/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Cadillac GT4 25T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.8 s
- Fastest top speed205 km/h127 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacGT425T | HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 202hp151kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,871kg4,125lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,550kg5,622lb |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.7s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated | 91.8s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 63.0s Calculated | 70.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 882km548mi Calculated | 1,196km743mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 2,151cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,633mm182in | 4,785mm188in |
| Width | 1,878mm74in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,536mm60in | 1,685mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,800mm110in | 2,765mm109in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,651mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,661mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 131mm5in | 176mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 289L | 831L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,190L | 1,704L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 67L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac GT4 25T: Power / Torque
- Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 3,800 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacGT425T | HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 63.0 s | 70.9 s |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 137 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 211 hp 157 kW |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 202 hp 151 kW |
Cadillac GT4 25T has 9 hp more than Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi.
The biggest power difference is between Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi and Cadillac GT4 25T: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 1,871 kg 4,125 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 8.8 s |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 9.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac GT4 25T and Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi and Cadillac GT4 25T: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 882 km 548 mi |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 1,196 km 743 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 211 hp 157 kW | 8.8 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 202 hp 151 kW | 9.0 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacGT425T | HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 202 hp 151 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,871 kg 4,125 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 882 km 548 mi | 1,196 km 743 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 289 L 10.2 cu ft | 831 L 29.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac GT4 25T | Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac GT4 25T
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 211 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi
- Has 170 Nm more
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 314 km (195 mi) more estimated range
- Has 542 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























