Rimac Nevera
Car comparison
Rimac Nevera 120 kWhvsBugatti Chiron Pur Sport 8.0 W16
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBugatti Chiron
Pur Sport 8.0 W16
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.0 s
- Fastest top speed412 km/h256 mph
- Most powerful1,914 hp1,427 kW
- Highest torque2,360 Nm1,741 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight890 hp/t664 kW/t1.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Bugatti Chiron Pur Sport 8.0 W16
- Lightest1,995 kg4,398 lb
- Best economy score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RimacNevera120 kWh | BugattiChironPur Sport 8.0 W16 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,914hp1,427kW | 1,500hp1,119kW |
| Torque | 2,360Nm1,741lb-ft | 1,600Nm1,180lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Top speed | 412 km/h 256 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 34.3s99% target: 408 km/h / 253 mph Calculated | 27.2s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.0s | 2.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 4.8s Calculated | 5.5s |
| 0-60 mph | 1.9s Calculated | 2.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 25.2L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 8.5s Calculated | 9.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 890hp/t664kW/t404hp/1000 lb Calculated | 752hp/t561kW/t341hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 1,098Nm/t734lb-ft/ton Calculated | 802Nm/t537lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 397km247mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 7,993cc488cu in |
| Length | 4,750mm187in | 4,647mm183in |
| Width | 1,986mm78in | 2,162mm85in |
| Height | 1,208mm48in | 1,212mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,745mm108in | 2,711mm107in |
| Front track | - | 1,776mm70in |
| Rear track | - | 1,695mm67in |
| Ground clearance | - | 115mm5in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | - | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RimacNevera120 kWh | BugattiChironPur Sport 8.0 W16 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 1.9 s | 2.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.0 s | 2.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 4.8 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 11.1 s | 15.4 s |
| Top speed | 412 km/h 256 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.5 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 3.9 s | 4.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 5.7 s | 6.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.2 s | 7.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 8.5 s | 9.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 284 km/h 176 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW |
| BugattiChironPur Sport 8.0 W16 | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW |
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh has 414 hp more than Bugatti Chiron Pur Sport 8.0 W16.
The biggest power difference is between Bugatti Chiron Pur Sport 8.0 W16 and Rimac Nevera 120 kWh: 414 hp (309 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2,360 Nm 1,741 lb-ft |
| BugattiChironPur Sport 8.0 W16 | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb |
| BugattiChironPur Sport 8.0 W16 | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 412 km/h 256 mph |
| BugattiChironPur Sport 8.0 W16 | 350 km/h 217 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2.0 s |
| BugattiChironPur Sport 8.0 W16 | 2.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Rimac Nevera 120 kWh and Bugatti Chiron Pur Sport 8.0 W16: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 890 hp/t 664 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp |
| BugattiChironPur Sport 8.0 W16 | 752 hp/t 561 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW | 2.0 s | 412 km/h 256 mph |
| BugattiChironPur Sport 8.0 W16 | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW | 2.3 s | 350 km/h 217 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BugattiChironPur Sport 8.0 W16 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RimacNevera120 kWh | BugattiChironPur Sport 8.0 W16 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 2,360 Nm 1,741 lb-ft | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.0 s | 2.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 412 km/h 256 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 25.2 L/100 km 9.3 mpg US 11.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 397 km 247 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 890 hp/t 664 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp | 752 hp/t 561 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bugatti Chiron Pur Sport 8.0 W16 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 25.2 L/100 km9.3 mpg US11.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 44.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 70.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,779 L998 US gal831 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 6,612 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
- Has 414 hp more
- Has 760 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 62 km/h (39 mph) higher top speed
- Has 138 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Bugatti Chiron Pur Sport 8.0 W16
- Is 155 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























