Porsche Cayenne III
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6vsBMW X7 (G07) 50i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X7 (G07)
50i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph
- Lightest2,020 kg4,453 lb
- Best power-to-weight218 hp/t162 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions213 g/km
- Best estimated range798 km496 mi
- Largest trunk770 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score92/100
BMW X7 (G07) 50i
- Most powerful462 hp345 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | BMWX7 (G07)50i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 440hp328kW | 462hp345kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,460kg5,423lb |
| Gross weight | 2,840kg6,261lb | 3,255kg7,176lb |
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 68.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 80.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.8s Calculated | 20.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 218hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 798km496mi Calculated | 728km452mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,894cc177cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,918mm194in | 5,151mm203in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 2,000mm79in |
| Height | 1,696mm67in | 1,805mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 3,105mm122in |
| Front track | - | 1,684mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,705mm67in |
| Ground clearance | - | 221mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 770L | 326L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,710L | 2,120L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 83L |
| CO2 emissions | 213g/km | 261g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6: Power / Torque
- BMW X7 (G07) 50i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 5,700-6,600 rpm | 1,800-5,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 5,250-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | BMWX7 (G07)50i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.8 s | 20.4 s |
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 440 hp 328 kW |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 462 hp 345 kW |
BMW X7 (G07) 50i has 22 hp more than Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 and BMW X7 (G07) 50i: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 2,460 kg 5,423 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 5.2 s |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 5.4 s |
Although BMW X7 (G07) 50i has more power, Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 and BMW X7 (G07) 50i: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 and BMW X7 (G07) 50i: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 798 km 496 mi |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 728 km 452 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 440 hp 328 kW | 5.2 s | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 462 hp 345 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX7 (G07)50i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX7 (G07)50i |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIIS 2.9 V6 | BMWX7 (G07)50i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 440 hp 328 kW | 462 hp 345 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,020 kg 4,453 lb | 2,460 kg 5,423 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 798 km 496 mi | 728 km 452 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 213 g/km | 261 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 770 L 27.2 cu ft | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6 | BMW X7 (G07) 50i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne III S 2.9 V6
- Is 440 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 km (43 mi) more estimated range
- Has 444 L more trunk volume
- Emits 48 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
BMW X7 (G07) 50i
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























