BMW X6 M (F86)
Car comparison
BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8vsBMW X7 (G07) 50i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X7 (G07)
50i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful575 hp429 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Lightest2,265 kg4,993 lb
- Best power-to-weight254 hp/t189 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions258 g/km
- Best estimated range766 km476 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 | BMWX7 (G07)50i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 575hp429kW | 462hp345kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,265kg4,993lb | 2,460kg5,423lb |
| Gross weight | 2,950kg6,504lb | 3,255kg7,176lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 80.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.7s Calculated | 20.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 254hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated | 188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 331Nm/t222lb-ft/ton Calculated | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 766km476mi Calculated | 728km452mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,909mm193in | 5,151mm203in |
| Width | 1,989mm78in | 2,000mm79in |
| Height | 1,689mm66in | 1,805mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 3,105mm122in |
| Front track | 1,666mm66in | 1,684mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,667mm66in | 1,705mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 195mm8in | 221mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 326L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,525L | 2,120L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 83L |
| CO2 emissions | 258g/km | 261g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW X7 (G07) 50i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,200-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 5,250-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 | BMWX7 (G07)50i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.7 s | 20.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 115 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 462 hp 345 kW |
BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 has 113 hp more than BMW X7 (G07) 50i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X7 (G07) 50i and BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8: 113 hp (84 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 2,460 kg 5,423 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 | 4.2 s |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 and BMW X7 (G07) 50i: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 | 766 km 476 mi |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 728 km 452 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 462 hp 345 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX7 (G07)50i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX7 (G07)50i |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| BMWX7 (G07)50i | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8 | BMWX7 (G07)50i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 575 hp 429 kW | 462 hp 345 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,265 kg 4,993 lb | 2,460 kg 5,423 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 766 km 476 mi | 728 km 452 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 258 g/km | 261 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8 | BMW X7 (G07) 50i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 M (F86) 4.4 V8
- Has 113 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 195 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 66 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 38 km (23 mi) more estimated range
- Has 224 L more trunk volume
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
BMW X7 (G07) 50i
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























