Car comparison

BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8vsBMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X6 M (F96)

4.4 V8

625 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbocharged2019-2023
VS

BMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012

4.4 V8

560 hp4395 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2012-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    625 hp
    466 kW
  • Highest torque
    750 Nm
    553 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,295 kg
    5,060 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    272 hp/t
    203 kW/t
    3.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.7 L/100 km
    18.5 mpg US
    22.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.5 L/100 km
    13.4 mpg US
    16.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    10.0 L/100 km
    23.5 mpg US
    28.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    654 km
    406 mi
  • Best performance score
    83/100
  • Best economy score
    73/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
Power
625hp466kW
560hp418kW
Torque
750Nm553lb-ft
680Nm502lb-ft
Curb weight
2,295kg5,060lb
2,380kg5,247lb
Gross weight
3,000kg6,614lb
2,905kg6,404lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
47.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
71.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
4.7s
0-200 km/h
13.2s
17.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
4.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK
13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK
19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.8s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
272hp/t203kW/t124hp/1000 lb
Calculated
235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
327Nm/t219lb-ft/ton
Calculated
286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
654km406mi
Calculated
612km380mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,395cc268cu in
4,395cc268cu in
Length
4,941mm195in
4,876mm192in
Width
2,019mm79in
1,983mm78in
Height
1,693mm67in
1,983mm78in
Wheelbase
2,972mm117in
2,933mm115in
Front track
1,699mm67in
1,660mm65in
Rear track
1,688mm66in
1,672mm66in
Ground clearance
213mm8in
-
Trunk volume
580L
-
Max trunk volume
1,530L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
83L
85L
CO2 emissions
289g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
  • BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V86,000 rpm1,800-5,800 rpm6,250 rpm
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V86,000 rpm1,500-5,650 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
4.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
4.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.2 s
17.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.1 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.7 s
8.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.9 s
10.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.8 s
12.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
191 km/h
119 mph
175 km/h
109 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8
625 hp
466 kW
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
560 hp
418 kW

BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 has 65 hp more than BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 and BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8: 65 hp (48 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8
2,295 kg
5,060 lb
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
2,380 kg
5,247 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V83.8 s
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V84.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 and BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 and BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8
654 km
406 mi
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
612 km
380 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8
625 hp
466 kW
3.8 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
560 hp
418 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8
Power
625 hp
466 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
580 L
20.5 cu ft
Length
4,941 mm
194.5 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,876 mm
192.0 in
Height
1,983 mm
78.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8
Power
625 hp
466 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK

BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
3.8 s
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
4.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
Power
625 hp
466 kW
560 hp
418 kW
Torque
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
2,295 kg
5,060 lb
2,380 kg
5,247 lb
Fuel consumption
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
580 L
20.5 cu ft
Length
4,941 mm
194.5 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,876 mm
192.0 in
Height
1,983 mm
78.1 in
Range score
654 km
406 mi
612 km
380 mi
CO2 score
289 g/km
-
Trunk score
580 L
20.5 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8
Consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.22 LC100 km24.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi35.77 LC100 mi39.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,334 LC/year3,649 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8

  • Has 65 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 85 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 42 km (26 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8
BMW X6 M (E71) 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)4.4 V8
4.4 V8
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8vsBMWX5 M (F95)Competition 4.4 V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8
4.4 V8
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8vsBMWM8 Convertible (F91)Competition 4.4 V8
4.4 V8
4.4
VS
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8vsBMWX5 M (E70)4.4
4.4 V8
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8vsBMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)Competition 4.4 V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8vsBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
4.4 V8
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8vsBMWM8 Convertible (F91)Facelift 2022Competition 4.4 V8
4.4 V8
AMG GL 63
VS
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
4.4 V8
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8vsBMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020Competition 4.4 V8
4.4 V8
50i
VS
BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8vsBMWX6 (F16)50i
BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 vs BMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster