BMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
BMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 · Stage 3vsBMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 · Stage 2vsBMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 · Stage 1vsBMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012
4.4 V8 (Stage 2)
BMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012
4.4 V8 (Stage 1)
BMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 840 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed292 km/h181 mph
- Most powerful840 hp626 kW
- Highest torque1,054 Nm777 lb-ft
- Lightest2,380 kg5,247 lb
- Best power-to-weight353 hp/t263 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption19.3 L/100 km12.2 mpg US14.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range612 km380 mi
- Best overall score88/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score70/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 3)840 hp | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 2)728 hp | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 1)661 hp | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8560 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 840hp626kW+280 hp | 728hp543kW+168 hp | 661hp493kW+101 hp | 560hp418kW |
| Torque | 1,054Nm777lb-ft+374 Nm | 918Nm677lb-ft+238 Nm | 830Nm612lb-ft+150 Nm | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,380kg5,247lb | 2,380kg5,247lb | 2,380kg5,247lb | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Gross weight | 2,905kg6,404lb | 2,905kg6,404lb | 2,905kg6,404lb | 2,905kg6,404lb |
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.2s99% target: 289 km/h / 180 mph-15.0 s Calculated | 60.8s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph-10.3 s Calculated | 62.6s99% target: 270 km/h / 168 mph-8.6 s Calculated | 71.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s-1.1 s | 4.0s-0.7 s | 4.2s-0.5 s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.6s-6.3 s Calculated | 12.8s-5.1 s Calculated | 14.6s-3.3 s Calculated | 17.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s-1.0 s Calculated | 3.8s-0.7 s Calculated | 4.0s-0.4 s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s-1.4 s Calculated | 11.9s-1.0 s Calculated | 12.3s-0.6 s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 353hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb Calculated | 306hp/t228kW/t139hp/1000 lb Calculated | 278hp/t207kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 443Nm/t296lb-ft/ton Calculated | 386Nm/t258lb-ft/ton Calculated | 349Nm/t233lb-ft/ton Calculated | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 612km380mi Calculated | 612km380mi Calculated | 612km380mi Calculated | 612km380mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,876mm192in | 4,876mm192in | 4,876mm192in | 4,876mm192in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 1,983mm78in | 1,983mm78in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,983mm78in | 1,983mm78in | 1,983mm78in | 1,983mm78in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,660mm65in | 1,660mm65in | 1,660mm65in | 1,660mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,672mm66in | 1,672mm66in | 1,672mm66in | 1,672mm66in |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L | 85L | 85L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 840 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 (Stage 2) 728 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 (Stage 1) 661 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 560 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 3)840 hp | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 2)728 hp | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 1)661 hp | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8560 hp | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 3)840 hp | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 2)728 hp | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 1)661 hp | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8560 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.8 s | 4.0 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 4.0 s | 4.2 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.6 s | 12.8 s | 14.6 s | 17.9 s |
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.2 s | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.8 s | 8.0 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 10.1 s | 10.4 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 11.9 s | 12.3 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 200 km/h 124 mph | 194 km/h 121 mph | 186 km/h 115 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 3)840 hp | 840 hp 626 kW |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 2)728 hp | 728 hp 543 kW |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 1)661 hp | 661 hp 493 kW |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8560 hp | 560 hp 418 kW |
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 840 hp has 280 hp more than BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 560 hp.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 560 hp and BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 840 hp: 280 hp (209 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 3)840 hp | 1,054 Nm 777 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 2)728 hp | 918 Nm 677 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 1)661 hp | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8560 hp | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 3)840 hp | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 2)728 hp | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 1)661 hp | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8560 hp | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 3)840 hp | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 2)728 hp | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 1)661 hp | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8560 hp | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 3)840 hp | 3.7 s |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 2)728 hp | 4.0 s |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 1)661 hp | 4.2 s |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8560 hp | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 840 hp and BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 560 hp: 1.1 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 (Stage 2) 728 hp and BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 (Stage 1) 661 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 3)840 hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 2)728 hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 1)661 hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8560 hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 3)840 hp | 353 hp/t 263 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 2)728 hp | 306 hp/t 228 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 1)661 hp | 278 hp/t 207 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8560 hp | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 3)840 hp | 612 km 380 mi |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 2)728 hp | 612 km 380 mi |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 1)661 hp | 612 km 380 mi |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8560 hp | 612 km 380 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 3)840 hp | 840 hp 626 kW | 3.7 s | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 2)728 hp | 728 hp 543 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 1)661 hp | 661 hp 493 kW | 4.2 s | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8560 hp | 560 hp 418 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 3)840 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 2)728 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 1)661 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8560 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 3)840 hp |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 2)728 hp |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 1)661 hp |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8560 hp |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 840 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 3)840 hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 2)728 hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 1)661 hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8560 hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 3)840 hp | 353 hp/t 263 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 2)728 hp | 306 hp/t 228 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 1)661 hp | 278 hp/t 207 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8560 hp | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 3)840 hp | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 2)728 hp | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 (Stage 1)661 hp | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8560 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 840 hp 626 kW | 728 hp 543 kW | 661 hp 493 kW | 560 hp 418 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,054 Nm 777 lb-ft | 918 Nm 677 lb-ft | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 4.0 s | 4.2 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 612 km 380 mi | 612 km 380 mi | 612 km 380 mi | 612 km 380 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 353 hp/t 263 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 306 hp/t 228 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 278 hp/t 207 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 840 hp | BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 (Stage 2) 728 hp | BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 (Stage 1) 661 hp | BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 560 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.33 LC100 km | 24.33 LC100 km | 24.33 LC100 km | 24.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,649 LC/year | 3,649 LC/year | 3,649 LC/year | 3,649 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 (Stage 3) 840 hp
- Has 112 hp more
- Has 136 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 (Stage 2) 728 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























