BMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
BMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012 4.4 V8vsBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 M50d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
M50d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Best power-to-weight235 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best practicality score92/100
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d
- Highest torque740 Nm546 lb-ft
- Lightest2,225 kg4,905 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,133 km704 mi
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 381hp284kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 740Nm546lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,380kg5,247lb | 2,225kg4,905lb |
| Gross weight | 2,905kg6,404lb | 2,830kg6,239lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 76.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s Calculated | 21.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated | 333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 612km380mi Calculated | 1,133km704mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,876mm192in | 4,857mm191in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 2,010mm79in |
| Height | 1,983mm78in | 1,766mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,660mm65in | 1,662mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,672mm66in | 1,702mm67in |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 4,000-4,400 rpm | 2,000-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 21.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 381 hp 284 kW |
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 has 179 hp more than BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d and BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: 179 hp (133 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 4.7 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d and BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: 6.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 612 km 380 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 1,133 km 704 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 381 hp 284 kW | 5.4 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 2010M50d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 381 hp 284 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 612 km 380 mi | 1,133 km 704 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.33 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,649 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8
- Has 179 hp more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 64 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 M50d
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Uses 6.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 522 km (324 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























