Car comparison

BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4vsLand Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X5 M (E70)

4.4

555 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2010-2013
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV

5.0 V8

510 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2012-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    555 hp
    414 kW
  • Highest torque
    680 Nm
    502 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,305 kg
    5,082 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    241 hp/t
    180 kW/t
    4.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    19.3 L/100 km
    12.2 mpg US
    14.6 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    620 L
  • Best overall score
    83/100
  • Best performance score
    79/100
  • Best economy score
    70/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    13.8 L/100 km
    17.0 mpg US
    20.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.9 L/100 km
    23.8 mpg US
    28.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    322 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    761 km
    473 mi

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX5 M (E70)4.4Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Power
555hp414kW
510hp380kW
Torque
680Nm502lb-ft
625Nm461lb-ft
Curb weight
2,305kg5,082lb
2,330kg5,137lb
Gross weight
2,905kg6,404lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
63.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
66.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
5.4s
0-200 km/h
16.9s
23.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
5.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK
20.6L/100 km11.4mpg US13.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
241hp/t180kW/t109hp/1000 lb
Calculated
219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
295Nm/t197lb-ft/ton
Calculated
268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
612km380mi
Calculated
761km473mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,395cc268cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,851mm191in
4,999mm197in
Width
1,994mm79in
1,983mm78in
Height
1,764mm69in
1,835mm72in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
2,922mm115in
Front track
1,660mm65in
1,690mm67in
Rear track
1,672mm66in
1,683mm66in
Ground clearance
207mm8in
-
Trunk volume
620L
550L
Max trunk volume
1,750L
2,030L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
105L
CO2 emissions
325g/km
322g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX5 M (E70)4.46,000 rpm1,500-5,650 rpm6,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,500-5,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX5 M (E70)4.4Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
5.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
5.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.9 s
23.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
11.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
13.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
178 km/h
111 mph
165 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4
555 hp
414 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW

BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 has 45 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8 and BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4: 45 hp (34 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
625 Nm
461 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4
2,305 kg
5,082 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
2,330 kg
5,137 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (E70)4.44.7 s
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V85.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 and Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4
241 hp/t
180 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4
612 km
380 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
761 km
473 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4
555 hp
414 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
5.4 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4
Power
555 hp
414 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
620 L
21.9 cu ft
Length
4,851 mm
191.0 in
Height
1,764 mm
69.4 in
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4
Power
555 hp
414 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK

BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
4.7 s
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
5.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4
241 hp/t
180 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX5 M (E70)4.4Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Power
555 hp
414 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
2,305 kg
5,082 lb
2,330 kg
5,137 lb
Fuel consumption
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
620 L
21.9 cu ft
Length
4,851 mm
191.0 in
Height
1,764 mm
69.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in
Range score
612 km
380 mi
761 km
473 mi
CO2 score
325 g/km
322 g/km
Trunk score
620 L
21.9 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
241 hp/t
180 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X5 M (E70) 4.4Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8
Consumption13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.33 LC100 km24.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi39.15 LC100 mi38.87 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,649 LC/year3,623 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4

  • Has 45 hp more
  • Has 55 Nm more
  • Is 25 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 70 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8

  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 149 km (93 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 3 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4
Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.4
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4vsBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
5.0 V8
AMG ML 63 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
4.4
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4vsBMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
5.0 V8
90D 90 kWh
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsTeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
4.4
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4vsBMWX6 M (E71)4.4 V8
5.0 V8
AMG GL 63
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
4.4
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4vsBMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
5.0 V8
Turbo 4.8 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
4.4
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4vsBMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
4.4
50i
VS
BMWX5 M (E70)4.4vsBMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201050i
5.0 V8
Turbo 4.8 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8
5.0 V8
50i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsBMWX6 (F16)50i
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 vs Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster