Car comparison

BMW X6 (F16) 50ivsLand Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X6 (F16)

50i

450 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2018
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV

5.0 V8

510 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2012-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X6 (F16) 50i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    650 Nm
    479 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,170 kg
    4,784 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.1 L/100 km
    18.0 mpg US
    21.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    227 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    876 km
    545 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    80/100
  • Best performance score
    77/100
  • Best economy score
    81/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX6 (F16)50iLand RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Power
450hp336kW
510hp380kW
Torque
650Nm479lb-ft
625Nm461lb-ft
Curb weight
2,170kg4,784lb
2,330kg5,137lb
Gross weight
2,885kg6,360lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
65.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
66.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.8s
5.4s
0-200 km/h
17.3s
Calculated
23.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
5.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK
20.6L/100 km11.4mpg US13.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.9s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
207hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb
Calculated
219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
300Nm/t200lb-ft/ton
Calculated
268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
876km545mi
Calculated
761km473mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,395cc268cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,909mm193in
4,999mm197in
Width
1,989mm78in
1,983mm78in
Height
1,702mm67in
1,835mm72in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
2,922mm115in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,690mm67in
Rear track
1,706mm67in
1,683mm66in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
-
Trunk volume
550L
550L
Max trunk volume
1,525L
2,030L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
105L
CO2 emissions
227g/km
322g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X6 (F16) 50iLand Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • BMW X6 (F16) 50i: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX6 (F16)50i5,500-6,000 rpm2,000-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,500-5,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX6 (F16)50iLand RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
5.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.8 s
5.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.3 s
23.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.9 s
11.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.9 s
13.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
177 km/h
110 mph
165 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)50i
450 hp
336 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW

Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8 has 60 hp more than BMW X6 (F16) 50i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 50i and Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8: 60 hp (45 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)50i
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
625 Nm
461 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)50i
2,170 kg
4,784 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
2,330 kg
5,137 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)50i
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)50i4.8 s
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V85.4 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8 has more power, BMW X6 (F16) 50i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 50i and Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)50i
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 50i and Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8: 4.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)50i
207 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)50i
876 km
545 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
761 km
473 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX6 (F16)50i
450 hp
336 kW
4.8 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
5.4 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX6 (F16)50i
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX6 (F16)50i
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK

BMW X6 (F16) 50i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX6 (F16)50i
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
4.8 s
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
5.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX6 (F16)50i
207 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX6 (F16)50iLand RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Power
450 hp
336 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.8 s
5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
2,170 kg
4,784 lb
2,330 kg
5,137 lb
Fuel consumption
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in
Range score
876 km
545 mi
761 km
473 mi
CO2 score
227 g/km
322 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
207 hp/t
155 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X6 (F16) 50iLand Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8
Consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.97 LC100 km24.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.32 LC100 mi38.87 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,546 LC/year3,623 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X6 (F16) 50i

  • Has 25 Nm more
  • Is 160 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 115 km (72 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 95 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8

  • Has 60 hp more
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X6 (F16) 50i
Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

50i
50i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)50ivsBMWX6 (E71)50i
5.0 V8
AMG ML 63 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
50i
M50d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)50ivsBMWX6 (G06)M50d
5.0 V8
90D 90 kWh
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsTeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
50i
M60i V8
VS
BMWX6 (F16)50ivsBMWX6 (G06 LCI)Facelift 2023M60i V8
5.0 V8
AMG GL 63
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
50i
50i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)50ivsBMWX7 (G07)50i
5.0 V8
Turbo 4.8 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
50i
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 (F16)50ivsBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
5.0 V8
4.4 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
50i
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX6 (F16)50ivsBMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
5.0 V8
Turbo 4.8 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8
BMW X6 (F16) 50i vs Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster