Porsche Cayenne II
Turbo 4.8 V8
500 hp4806 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2010-2014
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Land Rover Range Rover IV
5.0 V8
510 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2012-2017
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed278 km/h173 mph
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest2,170 kg4,784 lb
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.2 L/100 km14.5 mpg US17.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions270 g/km
- Largest trunk670 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Best estimated range761 km473 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 625Nm461lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Gross weight | 2,880kg6,349lb | - |
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.0s99% target: 275 km/h / 171 mph Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s Calculated | 23.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | 20.6L/100 km11.4mpg US13.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 230hp/t172kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 323Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 739km459mi Calculated | 761km473mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,806cc293cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,846mm191in | 4,999mm197in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,835mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,922mm115in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,690mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,669mm66in | 1,683mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 670L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | 2,030L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 105L |
| CO2 emissions | 270g/km | 322g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8PowerTorque
- Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,250-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 23.3 s |
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8 has 10 hp more than Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8 | 2,330 kg 5,137 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 278 km/h 173 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 4.7 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8 | 5.4 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8 has more power, Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 739 km 459 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8 | 761 km 473 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.7 s | 278 km/h 173 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8 |
| 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb | 2,330 kg 5,137 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 739 km 459 mi | 761 km 473 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 270 g/km | 322 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 670 L 23.7 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 | Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 24.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 38.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 3,623 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8
- Has 75 Nm more
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 43 km/h (27 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
- Emits 52 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 22 km (14 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8
Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsTeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne (955)Turbo S 4.5 V8
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsBMWX6 (F16)50i
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8