Car comparison

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Cayenne II

Turbo S 4.8 V8

550 hp4806 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2013-2014
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV

5.0 V8

510 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2012-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    283 km/h
    176 mph
  • Most powerful
    550 hp
    410 kW
  • Highest torque
    750 Nm
    553 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,215 kg
    4,883 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    248 hp/t
    185 kW/t
    4.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.8 L/100 km
    14.9 mpg US
    17.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    270 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    670 L
  • Best overall score
    86/100
  • Best performance score
    84/100
  • Best economy score
    76/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Power
550hp410kW
510hp380kW
Torque
750Nm553lb-ft
625Nm461lb-ft
Curb weight
2,215kg4,883lb
2,330kg5,137lb
Gross weight
2,880kg6,349lb
-
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
63.5s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph
Calculated
66.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.5s
5.4s
0-200 km/h
14.4s
Calculated
23.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.3s
Calculated
5.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK
20.6L/100 km11.4mpg US13.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.5s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
248hp/t185kW/t113hp/1000 lb
Calculated
219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
339Nm/t227lb-ft/ton
Calculated
268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
739km459mi
Calculated
761km473mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,806cc293cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,846mm191in
4,999mm197in
Width
1,939mm76in
1,983mm78in
Height
1,705mm67in
1,835mm72in
Wheelbase
2,895mm114in
2,922mm115in
Front track
1,655mm65in
1,690mm67in
Rear track
1,669mm66in
1,683mm66in
Ground clearance
215mm8in
-
Trunk volume
670L
550L
Max trunk volume
1,780L
2,030L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
105L
CO2 emissions
270g/km
322g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V86,000 rpm2,250-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,500-5,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.3 s
5.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.5 s
5.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.4 s
23.3 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.2 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.6 s
11.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.5 s
13.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
187 km/h
116 mph
165 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
550 hp
410 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8 has 40 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8 and Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8: 40 hp (30 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
625 Nm
461 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
2,215 kg
4,883 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
2,330 kg
5,137 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
283 km/h
176 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V84.5 s
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V85.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8: 2.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
248 hp/t
185 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
739 km
459 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
761 km
473 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.5 s
283 km/h
176 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
5.4 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
670 L
23.7 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
4.5 s
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
5.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
248 hp/t
185 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.5 s
5.4 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
2,215 kg
4,883 lb
2,330 kg
5,137 lb
Fuel consumption
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
670 L
23.7 cu ft
Length
4,846 mm
190.8 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in
Range score
739 km
459 mi
761 km
473 mi
CO2 score
270 g/km
322 g/km
Trunk score
670 L
23.7 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
248 hp/t
185 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8
Consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.13 LC100 km24.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.39 LC100 mi38.87 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,019 LC/year3,623 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8

  • Has 40 hp more
  • Has 125 Nm more
  • Is 115 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 48 km/h (30 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 120 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 52 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8

  • Has 22 km (14 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8
Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo 4.8 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
5.0 V8
AMG ML 63 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo S 4.8 V8
5.0 V8
90D 90 kWh
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsTeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo 4.0 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
5.0 V8
AMG GL 63
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo S 4.5 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne (955)Turbo S 4.5 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
GTS 4.0 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8
5.0 V8
4.4 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Turbo 3.6 V6 performance
VS
PorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance
5.0 V8
Turbo 4.8 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8
5.0 V8
50i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV5.0 V8vsBMWX6 (F16)50i
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo S 4.8 V8 vs Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster