BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 35ivsInfiniti QX70 3.7 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonInfiniti QX70
3.7 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions236 g/km
- Best estimated range842 km523 mi
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6
- Most powerful320 hp239 kW
- Lightest2,012 kg4,436 lb
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | InfinitiQX703.7 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,012kg4,436lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | - |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 83.8s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.0s Calculated | 30.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 17.4L/100 km13.5mpg US16.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 842km523mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 3,696cc226cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 4,865mm192in |
| Width | 1,933mm76in | - |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,680mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,885mm114in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,640mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 222mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 410L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 236g/km | 293g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: Power / Torque
- Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 5,800 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | InfinitiQX703.7 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.0 s | 30.2 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 320 hp 239 kW |
Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6 has 14 hp more than BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i and Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 2,012 kg 4,436 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 6.8 s |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 6.8 s |
Although Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6 has more power, BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i and Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 842 km 523 mi |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.8 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 |
| 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | 2,012 kg 4,436 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 842 km 523 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 236 g/km | 293 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i | Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 22.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 35.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,890 L499 US gal416 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 3,308 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 127 km (79 mi) more estimated range
- Has 210 L more trunk volume
- Emits 57 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 58 kg lighter
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























