BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 35ivsBMW X5 (E70) 35d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70)
35d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Lightest2,070 kg4,564 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score90/100
BMW X5 (E70) 35d
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions220 g/km
- Best estimated range1,024 km636 mi
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX5 (E70)35d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,790kg6,151lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 80.5s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.0s Calculated | 40.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 842km523mi Calculated | 1,024km636mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 4,854mm191in |
| Width | 1,933mm76in | 1,933mm76in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,739mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,558mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,581mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 222mm9in | 222mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | 1,750L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 236g/km | 220g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70) 35d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 5,800 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 4,400 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX5 (E70)35d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.0 s | 40.1 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 286 hp 213 kW |
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i has 20 hp more than BMW X5 (E70) 35d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (E70) 35d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 6.8 s |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i and BMW X5 (E70) 35d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (E70) 35d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 842 km 523 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 1,024 km 636 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 286 hp 213 kW | 7.0 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70)35d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70)35d |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70) 35d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70)35d | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | BMWX5 (E70)35d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 842 km 523 mi | 1,024 km 636 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 236 g/km | 220 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i | BMW X5 (E70) 35d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X5 (E70) 35d
- Has 180 Nm more
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 183 km (113 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























