BMW X6 (E71)
Car comparison
BMW X6 (E71) 35ivsBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 35i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
35i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X6 (E71) 35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest2,070 kg4,564 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions236 g/km
- Best estimated range842 km523 mi
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score80/100
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 (E71)35i | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Gross weight | 2,670kg5,886lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 86.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.7s Calculated | 30.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 842km523mi Calculated | 842km523mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,877mm192in | 4,857mm191in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 1,933mm76in |
| Height | 1,690mm67in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,706mm67in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 222mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 1,750L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 236g/km | 236g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 (E71) 35i: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 5,800 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 5,800 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 (E71)35i | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.7 s | 30.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 6.7 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (E71) 35i and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 842 km 523 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 842 km 523 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X6 (E71) 35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 (E71)35i | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 842 km 523 mi | 842 km 523 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 236 g/km | 236 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 (E71) 35i | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 (E71) 35i
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























