BMW X6 (E71)
Car comparison
BMW X6 (E71) 35ivsBMW X3 (E83) · Facelift 2006 35d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (E83) · Facelift 2006
35d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions208 g/km
- Best estimated range859 km534 mi
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score86/100
BMW X6 (E71) 35i
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 (E71)35i | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Gross weight | 2,670kg5,886lb | 2,385kg5,258lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 80.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.7s Calculated | 26.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 842km523mi Calculated | 859km534mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,877mm192in | 4,569mm180in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 1,853mm73in |
| Height | 1,690mm67in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,795mm110in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,706mm67in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 201mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 480L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 236g/km | 208g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 (E71) 35i: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 5,800 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 4,400 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 (E71)35i | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.7 s | 26.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 286 hp 213 kW |
BMW X6 (E71) 35i has 20 hp more than BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d and BMW X6 (E71) 35i: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 6.7 s |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 6.4 s |
Although BMW X6 (E71) 35i has more power, BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d and BMW X6 (E71) 35i: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d and BMW X6 (E71) 35i: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 842 km 523 mi |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 859 km 534 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.4 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 (E71)35i | BMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200635d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 842 km 523 mi | 859 km 534 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 236 g/km | 208 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 (E71) 35i | BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 (E71) 35i
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X3 (E83) Facelift 2006 35d
- Has 180 Nm more
- Is 195 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 17 km (11 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 28 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























