BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 40dvsInfiniti QX70 3.7 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonInfiniti QX70
3.7 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions198 g/km
- Best estimated range1,133 km704 mi
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6
- Most powerful320 hp239 kW
- Lightest2,012 kg4,436 lb
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | InfinitiQX703.7 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,012kg4,436lb |
| Gross weight | 2,790kg6,151lb | - |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 83.8s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.4s Calculated | 30.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 17.4L/100 km13.5mpg US16.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,133km704mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 3,696cc226cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 4,865mm192in |
| Width | 1,933mm76in | - |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,680mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,885mm114in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,640mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 222mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 410L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 198g/km | 293g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d: Power / Torque
- Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | InfinitiQX703.7 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.4 s | 30.2 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 306 hp 228 kW |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 320 hp 239 kW |
Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6 has 14 hp more than BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d and Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 2,012 kg 4,436 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 6.6 s |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 6.8 s |
Although Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6 has more power, BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d and Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d and Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6: 5.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 1,133 km 704 mi |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.6 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.8 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 |
| 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | 2,012 kg 4,436 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,133 km 704 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 198 g/km | 293 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d | Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 22.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 35.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,890 L499 US gal416 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 3,308 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d
- Has 240 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 5.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 419 km (260 mi) more estimated range
- Has 210 L more trunk volume
- Emits 95 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 98 kg lighter
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























