BMW X5 (E70)
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70) 48ivsBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 35i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
35i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70) 48i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful355 hp265 kW
- Highest torque475 Nm350 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score62/100
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Lightest2,070 kg4,564 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions236 g/km
- Best estimated range842 km523 mi
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70)48i | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 355hp265kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 475Nm350lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,105kg4,641lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Gross weight | 2,785kg6,140lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 86.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 30.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 708km440mi Calculated | 842km523mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,799cc293cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,854mm191in | 4,857mm191in |
| Width | 1,933mm76in | 1,933mm76in |
| Height | 1,739mm68in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 222mm9in | 222mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | 1,750L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 286g/km | 236g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70) 48i: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 6,300 rpm | 3,400-3,800 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 5,800 rpm | 1,200-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70)48i | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 30.0 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 355 hp 265 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW |
BMW X5 (E70) 48i has 49 hp more than BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i and BMW X5 (E70) 48i: 49 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 6.5 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E70) 48i and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i and BMW X5 (E70) 48i: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 708 km 440 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 842 km 523 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 355 hp 265 kW | 6.5 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70) 48i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70)48i | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 355 hp 265 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 708 km 440 mi | 842 km 523 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 286 g/km | 236 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70) 48i | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70) 48i
- Has 49 hp more
- Has 75 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 35i
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 133 km (83 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 50 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























