BMW X5 (E70)
Car comparison
BMW X5 (E70) 48ivsBMW X1 (E84) 28i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (E84)
28i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70) 48i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful355 hp265 kW
- Highest torque475 Nm350 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Best estimated range708 km440 mi
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score89/100
BMW X1 (E84) 28i
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (E70)48i | BMWX1 (E84)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 355hp265kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 475Nm350lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,105kg4,641lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 2,785kg6,140lb | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 84.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 75.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 26.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 708km440mi Calculated | 670km416mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,799cc293cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,854mm191in | 4,454mm175in |
| Width | 1,933mm76in | 1,789mm70in |
| Height | 1,739mm68in | 1,545mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,760mm109in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,529mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 222mm9in | 194mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | 1,350L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 286g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (E70) 48i: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (E84) 28i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 6,300 rpm | 3,400-3,800 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 6,600 rpm | 2,600-3,000 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (E70)48i | BMWX1 (E84)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 26.1 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 355 hp 265 kW |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 258 hp 192 kW |
BMW X5 (E70) 48i has 97 hp more than BMW X1 (E84) 28i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (E84) 28i and BMW X5 (E70) 48i: 97 hp (72 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 6.5 s |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E70) 48i and BMW X1 (E84) 28i: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (E84) 28i and BMW X5 (E70) 48i: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 708 km 440 mi |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 670 km 416 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 355 hp 265 kW | 6.5 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (E84)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (E84)28i |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70) 48i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (E70)48i | BMWX1 (E84)28i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 355 hp 265 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 708 km 440 mi | 670 km 416 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 286 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (E70) 48i | BMW X1 (E84) 28i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (E70) 48i
- Has 97 hp more
- Has 165 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 38 km (24 mi) more estimated range
- Has 200 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW X1 (E84) 28i
- Is 495 kg lighter
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























