BMW X6 (E71)
Car comparison
BMW X6 (E71) 35ivsBMW X5 (E70) 48i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70)
48i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70) 48i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Most powerful355 hp265 kW
- Highest torque475 Nm350 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score89/100
BMW X6 (E71) 35i
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,070 kg4,564 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions262 g/km
- Best estimated range780 km485 mi
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 (E71)35i | BMWX5 (E70)48i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 355hp265kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 475Nm350lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,105kg4,641lb |
| Gross weight | 2,670kg5,886lb | 2,785kg6,140lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 84.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.7s Calculated | 27.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 780km485mi Calculated | 708km440mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 4,799cc293cu in |
| Length | 4,877mm192in | 4,854mm191in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 1,933mm76in |
| Height | 1,690mm67in | 1,739mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,706mm67in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 222mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 1,750L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 262g/km | 286g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 (E71) 35i: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70) 48i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 5,800-6,250 rpm | 1,300-5,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 6,300 rpm | 3,400-3,800 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 (E71)35i | BMWX5 (E70)48i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.7 s | 27.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 355 hp 265 kW |
BMW X5 (E70) 48i has 49 hp more than BMW X6 (E71) 35i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 (E71) 35i and BMW X5 (E70) 48i: 49 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 6.7 s |
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E70) 48i and BMW X6 (E71) 35i: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (E71) 35i and BMW X5 (E70) 48i: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 780 km 485 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 708 km 440 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 355 hp 265 kW | 6.5 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70)48i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70)48i |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70) 48i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (E71)35i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70)48i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 (E71)35i | BMWX5 (E70)48i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 355 hp 265 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,070 kg 4,564 lb | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 780 km 485 mi | 708 km 440 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 262 g/km | 286 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 (E71) 35i | BMW X5 (E70) 48i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 (E71) 35i
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 71 km (44 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 24 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 (E70) 48i
- Has 49 hp more
- Has 75 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























