Nissan Murano II (Z51)
Car comparison
Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5vsBMW X5 (E70) 30i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70)
30i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70) 30i
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.7 L/100 km17.2 mpg US20.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Highest torque334 Nm246 lb-ft
- Lightest1,790 kg3,946 lb
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | BMWX5 (E70)30i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 256hp191kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 334Nm246lb-ft | 315Nm232lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Gross weight | 2,257kg4,976lb | 2,680kg5,908lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 91.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 93.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.6s Calculated | 42.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 158Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 774km481mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,860mm191in | 4,854mm191in |
| Width | 1,885mm74in | 1,933mm76in |
| Height | 1,720mm68in | 1,739mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,825mm111in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | - | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 222mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 402L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,750L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 82L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 244g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70) 30i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 6,650 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,900 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | BMWX5 (E70)30i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.6 s | 42.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 256 hp 191 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 272 hp 203 kW |
BMW X5 (E70) 30i has 16 hp more than Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 and BMW X5 (E70) 30i: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 334 Nm 246 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 2,000 kg 4,409 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 8.0 s |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 8.1 s |
Although BMW X5 (E70) 30i has more power, Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 and BMW X5 (E70) 30i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 774 km 481 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 256 hp 191 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 272 hp 203 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70)30i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70)30i |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | BMWX5 (E70)30i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 256 hp 191 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 334 Nm 246 lb-ft | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | 2,000 kg 4,409 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 774 km 481 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 244 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 | BMW X5 (E70) 30i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.55 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,783 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5
- Has 19 Nm more
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 (E70) 30i
- Has 16 hp more
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 60 km (37 mi) more estimated range
- Has 218 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























