BMW X1 (E84)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (E84) 28ivsNissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Murano II (Z51)
3.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (E84) 28i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score82/100
Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5
- Highest torque334 Nm246 lb-ft
- Best estimated range774 km481 mi
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (E84)28i | NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 256hp191kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 334Nm246lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,610kg3,549lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,257kg4,976lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 91.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 41.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 670km416mi Calculated | 774km481mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,454mm175in | 4,860mm191in |
| Width | 1,789mm70in | 1,885mm74in |
| Height | 1,545mm61in | 1,720mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,825mm111in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | - |
| Rear track | 1,529mm60in | - |
| Ground clearance | 194mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 402L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,350L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 82L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (E84) 28i: Power / Torque
- Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 6,600 rpm | 2,600-3,000 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (E84)28i | NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 41.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 258 hp 192 kW |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 256 hp 191 kW |
BMW X1 (E84) 28i has 2 hp more than Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 and BMW X1 (E84) 28i: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 334 Nm 246 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 6.8 s |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (E84) 28i and Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (E84) 28i and Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 670 km 416 mi |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 774 km 481 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 256 hp 191 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (E84) 28i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (E84)28i | NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 256 hp 191 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 334 Nm 246 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 670 km 416 mi | 774 km 481 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (E84) 28i | Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (E84) 28i
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 180 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 18 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5
- Has 24 Nm more
- Has 103 km (64 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























