AUDI Q5 I (8R)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6vsNissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Murano II (Z51)
3.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful270 hp201 kW
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range806 km501 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5
- Highest torque334 Nm246 lb-ft
- Lightest1,790 kg3,946 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 270hp201kW | 256hp191kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 334Nm246lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,805kg3,979lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Gross weight | 2,415kg5,324lb | 2,257kg4,976lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.6s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 91.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.3s Calculated | 41.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 806km501mi Calculated | 774km481mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,197cc195cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,629mm182in | 4,860mm191in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,885mm74in |
| Height | 1,653mm65in | 1,720mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,825mm111in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 402L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,560L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 82L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
- Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.3 s | 41.7 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 270 hp 201 kW |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 256 hp 191 kW |
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 has 14 hp more than Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 and AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 334 Nm 246 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 6.9 s |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 and Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 and Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 806 km 501 mi |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 774 km 481 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 270 hp 201 kW | 6.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 256 hp 191 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 270 hp 201 kW | 256 hp 191 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 334 Nm 246 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 806 km 501 mi | 774 km 481 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 | Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 33 km (20 mi) more estimated range
- Has 138 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5
- Has 4 Nm more
- Is 15 kg lighter
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























