BMW X3 (F25)
Car comparison
BMW X3 (F25) 28ivsNissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Murano II (Z51)
3.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (F25) 28i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Lightest1,745 kg3,847 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5
- Highest torque334 Nm246 lb-ft
- Best estimated range774 km481 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX3 (F25)28i | NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 256hp191kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 334Nm246lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Gross weight | 2,305kg5,082lb | 2,257kg4,976lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 91.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.7s Calculated | 41.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 744km463mi Calculated | 774km481mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,648mm183in | 4,860mm191in |
| Width | 1,881mm74in | 1,885mm74in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,720mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,825mm111in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,632mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 402L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 82L |
| CO2 emissions | 210g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X3 (F25) 28i: Power / Torque
- Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 6,600 rpm | 2,600-3,000 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX3 (F25)28i | NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.7 s | 41.7 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 258 hp 192 kW |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 256 hp 191 kW |
BMW X3 (F25) 28i has 2 hp more than Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 and BMW X3 (F25) 28i: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 334 Nm 246 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 6.9 s |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 28i and Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (F25) 28i and Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 744 km 463 mi |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 774 km 481 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.9 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 256 hp 191 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (F25) 28i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX3 (F25)28i | NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 256 hp 191 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 334 Nm 246 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 744 km 463 mi | 774 km 481 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 210 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X3 (F25) 28i | Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X3 (F25) 28i
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 148 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5
- Has 24 Nm more
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























