BMW X5 (G05 LCI) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
BMW X5 (G05 LCI) · Facelift 2023 30dvsBMW X5 (E70) 30i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70)
30i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 30d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range976 km606 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score85/100
BMW X5 (E70) 30i
- Lightest2,000 kg4,409 lb
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d | BMWX5 (E70)30i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 315Nm232lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Gross weight | 2,950kg6,504lb | 2,680kg5,908lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 100.4s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 93.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.1s Calculated | 42.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated | 158Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 976km606mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,935mm194in | 4,854mm191in |
| Width | 2,004mm79in | 1,933mm76in |
| Height | 1,765mm69in | 1,739mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,975mm117in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,677mm66in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,698mm67in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 214mm8in | 222mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,870L | 1,750L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 244g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 30d: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70) 30i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 6,650 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,900 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d | BMWX5 (E70)30i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.1 s | 42.5 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d | 286 hp 213 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 272 hp 203 kW |
BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 30d has 14 hp more than BMW X5 (E70) 30i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (E70) 30i and BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 30d: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d | 2,220 kg 4,894 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 2,000 kg 4,409 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d | 6.1 s |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 30d and BMW X5 (E70) 30i: 2.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 30d and BMW X5 (E70) 30i: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d | 976 km 606 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.1 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 272 hp 203 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70)30i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70)30i |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 30d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70)30i | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d | BMWX5 (E70)30i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 315 Nm 232 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,220 kg 4,894 lb | 2,000 kg 4,409 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 976 km 606 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 244 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 30d | BMW X5 (E70) 30i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 (G05 LCI) Facelift 2023 30d
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 335 Nm more
- Is 2.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 142 km (88 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
BMW X5 (E70) 30i
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























