Car comparison

BMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014 28ivsLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014

28i

245 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2017
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015

2.0 Si4

240 hp1999 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    245 hp
    183 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    169 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    918 km
    570 mi
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428iLand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
245hp183kW
240hp179kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
340Nm251lb-ft
Curb weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,658kg3,655lb
Gross weight
2,360kg5,203lb
-
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
76.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
87.1s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
29.3s
Calculated
42.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton
Calculated
205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
918km570mi
Calculated
897km558mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,657mm183in
4,371mm172in
Width
1,881mm74in
1,985mm78in
Height
1,661mm65in
1,660mm65in
Wheelbase
2,810mm111in
2,660mm105in
Front track
1,616mm64in
1,625mm64in
Rear track
1,632mm64in
1,629mm64in
Ground clearance
204mm8in
-
Trunk volume
550L
-
Max trunk volume
1,600L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
67L
70L
CO2 emissions
169g/km
181g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28iLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4PowerTorque
  • BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28i: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i5,000-6,500 rpm1,250-4,800 rpm6,750 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si45,800 rpm1,750 rpm6,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428iLand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.3 s
42.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
156 km/h
97 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
245 hp
183 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
240 hp
179 kW

BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28i has 5 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 and BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28i: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
340 Nm
251 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
1,658 kg
3,655 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i6.5 s
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si47.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28i and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28i and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
918 km
570 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
897 km
558 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
245 hp
183 kW
6.5 s
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
240 hp
179 kW
7.6 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,657 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,661 mm
65.4 in
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,371 mm
172.1 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
6.5 s
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428iLand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
245 hp
183 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,657 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,661 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,371 mm
172.1 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Range score
918 km
570 mi
897 km
558 mi
CO2 score
169 g/km
181 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28iLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.78 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.56 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,916 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28i

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 20 km (13 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 12 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) 28i
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I 2.0 Si4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

28i
28i
VS
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428ivsBMWX3 (F25)28i
2.0 Si4
Sport 2.0 T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
28i
30i
VS
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428ivsBMWX3 (E83)Facelift 200630i
2.0 Si4
2.0d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
28i
3.0i
VS
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428ivsBMWX3 (E83)3.0i
2.0 Si4
200t
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
28i
30i
VS
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428ivsBMWX3 (G01)30i
2.0 Si4
2.0 BiTDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
28i
30i
VS
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428ivsBMWX3 (G01 LCI)Facelift 202130i
2.0 Si4
2.0
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
28i
30
VS
BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428ivsBMWX3 (G45)30
2.0 Si4
25d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsBMWX1 (F48)25d
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014 28i vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster