BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20dvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-30
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 20d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,085 km674 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20d | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 186hp139kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,465kg3,230lb |
| Gross weight | 2,125kg4,685lb | 1,965kg4,332lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.6s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 73.7s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.0s Calculated | 61.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,085km674mi Calculated | 895km556mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,540mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,655mm105in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 180mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,406L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20d: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 6,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20d | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.0 s | 61.6 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 186 hp 139 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 20d has 4 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and BMW X2 (F39) 20d: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 7.9 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20d and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20d and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 1,085 km 674 mi |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 895 km 556 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 186 hp 139 kW | 8.3 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20d | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 186 hp 139 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,085 km 674 mi | 895 km 556 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20d | Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20d
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 160 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 190 km (118 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























