BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20dvsBMW X1 (F48) 20i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (F48)
20i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 20d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,085 km674 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
BMW X1 (F48) 20i
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20d | BMWX1 (F48)20i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,125kg4,685lb | 2,155kg4,751lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.6s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 79.8s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.0s Calculated | 35.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,085km674mi Calculated | 910km566mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,439mm175in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,821mm72in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,598mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,561mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 183mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,550L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 152g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20d: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (F48) 20i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20d | BMWX1 (F48)20i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.0 s | 35.9 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
BMW X1 (F48) 20i has 2 hp more than BMW X2 (F39) 20d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20d and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 7.9 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 7.9 s |
Although BMW X1 (F48) 20i has more power, BMW X2 (F39) 20d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20d and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 1,085 km 674 mi |
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 910 km 566 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.9 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20i |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20d | BMWX1 (F48)20i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,085 km 674 mi | 910 km 566 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 152 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20d | BMW X1 (F48) 20i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20d
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 175 km (109 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW X1 (F48) 20i
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























