BMW X1 (F48)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (F48) 20ivsBMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012 20i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012
20i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 20i
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions152 g/km
- Best estimated range910 km566 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score84/100
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (F48)20i | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,035kg4,486lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.8s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.9s Calculated | 35.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 910km566mi Calculated | 887km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,439mm175in | 4,477mm176in |
| Width | 1,821mm72in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,545mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,760mm109in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,529mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 183mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,350L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 152g/km | 165g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (F48) 20i: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 5,000-6,250 rpm | 1,250-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (F48)20i | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.9 s | 35.5 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 184 hp 137 kW |
BMW X1 (F48) 20i has 8 hp more than BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 7.9 s |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 7.4 s |
Although BMW X1 (F48) 20i has more power, BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 910 km 566 mi |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 887 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.9 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.4 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (F48)20i | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 910 km 566 mi | 887 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 152 g/km | 165 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (F48) 20i | BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (F48) 20i
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 23 km (14 mi) more estimated range
- Has 85 L more trunk volume
- Emits 13 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























