BMW X1 (F48)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (F48) 20ivsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (F60)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions122 g/km
- Best estimated range1,109 km689 mi
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score94/100
BMW X1 (F48) 20i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (F48)20i | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,105kg4,641lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.8s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 80.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.9s Calculated | 38.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 910km566mi Calculated | 1,109km689mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,439mm175in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,821mm72in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,557mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 183mm7in | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,390L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 152g/km | 122g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (F48) 20i: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (F48)20i | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.9 s | 38.3 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW X1 (F48) 20i has 2 hp more than Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 7.9 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 910 km 566 mi |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,109 km 689 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.9 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (F48)20i | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 910 km 566 mi | 1,109 km 689 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 152 g/km | 122 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (F48) 20i | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 8.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,208 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (F48) 20i
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 198 km (123 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 30 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























