BMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012 20ivsBMW X1 (F48) 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (F48)
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,550 kg3,417 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions133 g/km
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score84/100
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,550kg3,417lb |
| Gross weight | 2,035kg4,486lb | 2,145kg4,729lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 75.5s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.5s Calculated | 36.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 887km551mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,477mm176in | 4,439mm175in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,821mm72in |
| Height | 1,545mm61in | 1,598mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,561mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,529mm60in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 183mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,350L | 1,550L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 165g/km | 133g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 5,000-6,250 rpm | 1,250-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.5 s | 36.8 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 184 hp 137 kW |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW X1 (F48) 20d has 6 hp more than BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i and BMW X1 (F48) 20d: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 7.4 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 7.6 s |
Although BMW X1 (F48) 20d has more power, BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i and BMW X1 (F48) 20d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 887 km 551 mi |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.4 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | BMWX1 (F48)20d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 887 km 551 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 165 g/km | 133 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i | BMW X1 (F48) 20d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 113 km (70 mi) more estimated range
- Has 85 L more trunk volume
- Emits 32 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























