BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20dvsBMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012 20i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012
20i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 20d
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,085 km674 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score82/100
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20d | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | 2,125kg4,685lb | 2,035kg4,486lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.6s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.0s Calculated | 35.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,085km674mi Calculated | 887km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,477mm176in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,545mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,760mm109in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,529mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,350L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 165g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20d: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 5,000-6,250 rpm | 1,250-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20d | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.0 s | 35.5 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 184 hp 137 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 20d has 6 hp more than BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i and BMW X2 (F39) 20d: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 7.9 s |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 7.4 s |
Although BMW X2 (F39) 20d has more power, BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i and BMW X2 (F39) 20d: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20d and BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 1,085 km 674 mi |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 887 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.4 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20d | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,085 km 674 mi | 887 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 165 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20d | BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20d
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 198 km (123 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 20i
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























