Car comparison

BMW X2 (F39) 18dvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X2 (F39)

18d

150 hp1995 ccDieselAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2018-2023
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 e-Skyactiv G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X2 (F39) 18d

  • Fastest top speed
    206 km/h
    128 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    981 km
    609 mi
  • Largest trunk
    470 L
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    42/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Lightest
    1,407 kg
    3,102 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    107 hp/t
    79 kW/t
    9.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX2 (F39)18dMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
213Nm157lb-ft
Curb weight
1,580kg3,483lb
1,407kg3,102lb
Gross weight
2,160kg4,762lb
1,927kg4,248lb
Top speed
206 km/h
128 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
To 99% top speed
84.9s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph
Calculated
77.0s99% target: 196 km/h / 122 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.2s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
62.7s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.7s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.7s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
95hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
151Nm/t101lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
981km609mi
Calculated
981km609mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,360mm172in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,526mm60in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,563mm62in
-
Rear track
1,562mm61in
-
Ground clearance
182mm7in
175mm7in
Trunk volume
470L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,355L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
51L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X2 (F39) 18dMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv GPowerTorque
  • BMW X2 (F39) 18d: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX2 (F39)18d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX2 (F39)18dMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.7 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.2 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
62.7 s
-
Top speed
206 km/h
128 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.9 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
14.1 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.7 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)18d
150 hp
112 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)18d
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
213 Nm
157 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)18d
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
1,407 kg
3,102 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)18d
206 km/h
128 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
198 km/h
123 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)18d9.2 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G and BMW X2 (F39) 18d: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)18d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)18d
95 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.5 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)18d
981 km
609 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
981 km
609 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX2 (F39)18d
150 hp
112 kW
9.2 s
206 km/h
128 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
198 km/h
123 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX2 (F39)18d
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
206 km/h
128 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX2 (F39)18d
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
206 km/h
128 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

BMW X2 (F39) 18d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX2 (F39)18d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
9.2 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX2 (F39)18d
95 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.5 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX2 (F39)18dMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
213 Nm
157 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.2 s
8.8 s
Top speed
206 km/h
128 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
Lightness
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
1,407 kg
3,102 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
981 km
609 mi
981 km
609 mi
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
95 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.5 kg/hp
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X2 (F39) 18dMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 18d

  • Has 137 Nm more
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 40 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Is 173 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X2 (F39) 18d
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

18d
18d
VS
BMWX2 (F39)18dvsBMWX2 (U10)18d
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
18d
20d
VS
BMWX2 (F39)18dvsBMWX1 (F48)20d
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-32.0i
18d
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
BMWX2 (F39)18dvsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
18d
GLB 200d
VS
BMWX2 (F39)18dvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
18d
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
VS
BMWX2 (F39)18dvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
35 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
18d
GLA 200d
VS
BMWX2 (F39)18dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d
18d
Cooper D 2.0
VS
BMWX2 (F39)18dvsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
BMW X2 (F39) 18d vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G - car comparison - FastVsFaster