BMW X1 (F48)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (F48) 20ivsBMW X2 (F39) 18d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X2 (F39)
18d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 20i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best practicality score84/100
BMW X2 (F39) 18d
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range981 km609 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (F48)20i | BMWX2 (F39)18d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,160kg4,762lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.8s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 84.9s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 9.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.9s Calculated | 62.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 8.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 95hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 910km566mi Calculated | 981km609mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,439mm175in | 4,360mm172in |
| Width | 1,821mm72in | 1,824mm72in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,526mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 183mm7in | 182mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,355L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 152g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (F48) 20i: Power / Torque
- BMW X2 (F39) 18d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (F48)20i | BMWX2 (F39)18d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 8.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 9.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.9 s | 62.7 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 14.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 150 hp 112 kW |
BMW X1 (F48) 20i has 42 hp more than BMW X2 (F39) 18d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 18d and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 42 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 206 km/h 128 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 7.9 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 9.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20i and BMW X2 (F39) 18d: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 18d and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 910 km 566 mi |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 981 km 609 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.9 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.2 s | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)18d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)18d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (F48)20i | BMWX2 (F39)18d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 9.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 910 km 566 mi | 981 km 609 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 152 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (F48) 20i | BMW X2 (F39) 18d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (F48) 20i
- Has 42 hp more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW X2 (F39) 18d
- Has 70 Nm more
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 70 km (44 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























