BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsBMW X1 (F48) 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (F48)
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,063 km660 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score84/100
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20i | BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,460kg3,219lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Gross weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 2,205kg4,861lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.6s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 78.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.8s Calculated | 38.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 850km528mi Calculated | 1,063km660mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,439mm175in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,821mm72in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,598mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,561mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 183mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,550L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 126g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20i | BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.8 s | 38.1 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 20i has 2 hp more than BMW X1 (F48) 20d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 7.7 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and BMW X1 (F48) 20d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 850 km 528 mi |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,063 km 660 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.7 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20i | BMWX1 (F48)20d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 850 km 528 mi | 1,063 km 660 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 126 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20i | BMW X1 (F48) 20d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 213 km (132 mi) more estimated range
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























