Car comparison

BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X2 (F39)

20i

192 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Volkswagen T-Roc I

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X2 (F39) 20i

  • Fastest top speed
    227 km/h
    141 mph
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    850 km
    528 mi
  • Largest trunk
    470 L
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,420 kg
    3,131 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    134 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.5 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX2 (F39)20iVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
192hp143kW
190hp142kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,460kg3,219lb
1,420kg3,131lb
Gross weight
2,055kg4,530lb
1,990kg4,387lb
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
77.6s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
67.5s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
32.8s
Calculated
35.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
850km528mi
Calculated
809km503mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,360mm172in
4,234mm167in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,819mm72in
Height
1,526mm60in
1,573mm62in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,590mm102in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,546mm61in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,541mm61in
Ground clearance
182mm7in
161mm6in
Trunk volume
470L
445L
Max trunk volume
1,355L
1,290L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X2 (F39) 20iVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX2 (F39)20i5,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX2 (F39)20iVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.8 s
35.7 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
192 hp
143 kW
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

BMW X2 (F39) 20i has 2 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
1,460 kg
3,219 lb
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
1,420 kg
3,131 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
227 km/h
141 mph
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
216 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i7.7 s
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI7.2 s

Although BMW X2 (F39) 20i has more power, Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)20i
850 km
528 mi
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
809 km
503 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX2 (F39)20i
192 hp
143 kW
7.7 s
227 km/h
141 mph
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
216 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX2 (F39)20i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX2 (F39)20i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX2 (F39)20i
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.7 s
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX2 (F39)20i
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX2 (F39)20iVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
192 hp
143 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.2 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,460 kg
3,219 lb
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Range score
850 km
528 mi
809 km
503 mi
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X2 (F39) 20iVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km11.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi19.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year1,785 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 20i

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 41 km (26 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 25 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI

  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 40 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

20i
20i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)20ivsBMWX2 (U10)20i
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
20i
20i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)20ivsBMWX1 (F48)20i
2.0 TSI
1.5 eTSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI
20i
20d
VS
BMWX2 (F39)20ivsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
20i
20i
VS
BMWX2 (F39)20ivsBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
20i
Cooper S 2.0
VS
BMWX2 (F39)20ivsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
2.0 TSI
330TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
20i
30d
VS
BMWX2 (F39)20ivsBMWX7 (G07)30d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
BMW X2 (F39) 20i vs Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster