BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsAUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q3 II (F3)
40 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range850 km528 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score91/100
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20i | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,460kg3,219lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Gross weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.6s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 79.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.8s Calculated | 37.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 850km528mi Calculated | 800km497mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,484mm177in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,856mm73in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,616mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 530L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,525L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 170g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20i | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.8 s | 37.1 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 20i has 2 hp more than AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 7.7 s |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.4 s |
Although BMW X2 (F39) 20i has more power, AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 850 km 528 mi |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 800 km 497 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.7 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20i | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 850 km 528 mi | 800 km 497 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 170 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20i | AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 km (31 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























