AUDI Q2
Car comparison
AUDI Q2 40 TFSIvsBMW X2 (F39) 20i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X2 (F39)
20i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range850 km528 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score82/100
AUDI Q2 40 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ240 TFSI | BMWX2 (F39)20i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,460kg3,219lb |
| Gross weight | 2,045kg4,508lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.6s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 77.6s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.8s Calculated | 32.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 821km510mi Calculated | 850km528mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,191mm165in | 4,360mm172in |
| Width | 1,794mm71in | 1,824mm72in |
| Height | 1,508mm59in | 1,526mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,547mm61in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,548mm61in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 182mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 355L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,000L | 1,355L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 153g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q2 40 TFSI: Power / Torque
- BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ240 TFSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ240 TFSI | BMWX2 (F39)20i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.8 s | 32.8 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ240 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 20i has 2 hp more than AUDI Q2 40 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q2 40 TFSI and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ240 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ240 TFSI | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ240 TFSI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ240 TFSI | 6.5 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 7.7 s |
Although BMW X2 (F39) 20i has more power, AUDI Q2 40 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q2 40 TFSI and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ240 TFSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and AUDI Q2 40 TFSI: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ240 TFSI | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ240 TFSI | 821 km 510 mi |
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 850 km 528 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ240 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.5 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.7 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ240 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ240 TFSI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q2 40 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ240 TFSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ240 TFSI | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ240 TFSI | BMWX2 (F39)20i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 821 km 510 mi | 850 km 528 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 153 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q2 40 TFSI | BMW X2 (F39) 20i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q2 40 TFSI
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Has 2 hp more
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























