Car comparison

BMW X1 (E84) 25ivsSeat Altea Freetrack · Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X1 (E84)

25i

218 hp2996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2010-2011
VS

Seat Altea Freetrack · Facelift 2009

2.0 TSI

211 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2009-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.0 L/100 km
    21.4 mpg US
    25.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    714 km
    444 mi
  • Largest trunk
    490 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

BMW X1 (E84) 25i

  • Fastest top speed
    223 km/h
    139 mph
  • Most powerful
    218 hp
    163 kW
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX1 (E84)25iSeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI
Power
218hp163kW
211hp157kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,600kg3,527lb
1,661kg3,662lb
Gross weight
2,180kg4,806lb
2,205kg4,861lb
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
81.8s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
80.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
36.5s
Calculated
39.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
677km421mi
Calculated
714km444mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,996cc183cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,454mm175in
4,493mm177in
Width
1,798mm71in
1,788mm70in
Height
1,545mm61in
1,622mm64in
Wheelbase
2,760mm109in
2,576mm101in
Front track
1,500mm59in
1,542mm61in
Rear track
1,529mm60in
1,518mm60in
Ground clearance
194mm8in
-
Trunk volume
420L
490L
Max trunk volume
1,350L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
63L
60L
CO2 emissions-
197g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X1 (E84) 25iSeat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • BMW X1 (E84) 25i: Power / Torque
  • Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX1 (E84)25i6,100 rpm2,500 rpm6,350 rpm
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI5,300-6,200 rpm1,700-5,200 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX1 (E84)25iSeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.5 s
39.4 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
147 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)25i
218 hp
163 kW
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW

BMW X1 (E84) 25i has 7 hp more than Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI and BMW X1 (E84) 25i: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)25i
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)25i
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI
1,661 kg
3,662 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)25i
223 km/h
139 mph
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)25i7.9 s
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI7.6 s

Although BMW X1 (E84) 25i has more power, Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI and BMW X1 (E84) 25i: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)25i
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI and BMW X1 (E84) 25i: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)25i
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)25i
677 km
421 mi
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI
714 km
444 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX1 (E84)25i
218 hp
163 kW
7.9 s
223 km/h
139 mph
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
7.6 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX1 (E84)25i
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,454 mm
175.4 in
Height
1,545 mm
60.8 in
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,493 mm
176.9 in
Height
1,622 mm
63.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX1 (E84)25i
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX1 (E84)25i
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
7.9 s
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX1 (E84)25i
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX1 (E84)25iSeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI
Power
218 hp
163 kW
211 hp
157 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
7.6 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
Fuel consumption
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,454 mm
175.4 in
Height
1,545 mm
60.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,493 mm
176.9 in
Height
1,622 mm
63.9 in
Range score
677 km
421 mi
714 km
444 mi
CO2 score
-
197 g/km
Trunk score
420 L
14.8 cu ft
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X1 (E84) 25iSeat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI
Consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.28 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.19 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,441 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X1 (E84) 25i

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Is 61 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI

  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 37 km (23 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 70 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X1 (E84) 25i
Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

25i
25d
VS
BMWX1 (E84)25ivsBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d
2.0 TSI
2.0 FSI
VS
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSIvsSeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
25i
20i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)25ivsBMWX1 (F48)20i
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
25i
23i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)25ivsBMWX1 (U11)23i
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
25i
28i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)25ivsBMWX3 (F25)28i
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI
25i
30i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)25ivsBMWX5 (E70)30i
2.0 TSI
23d
VS
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSIvsBMWX1 (E84)23d
25i
3.0d
VS
BMWX1 (E84)25ivsBMWX3 (E83)3.0d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSIvsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
BMW X1 (E84) 25i vs Seat Altea Freetrack · Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster